Faith of the Scientist

I’ll often hear people say things like, “I have no time for faith. I live my live on reason, observation and evidence.” Really?

I see. Well – let’s see how that works, shall we?

 

Lets imagine a scientist is doing some rigorous analysis, studying something in nature. How about, the behaviour of enzymes in the human digestive system. Well – I agree. That scientist is going to use reason, she’s going to make observations and also appeal to the evidence she gathers as she reaches her conclusions. But – what else is going on as she does so?[1]

 

1 – She BELIEVES that her senses are trustworthy. In other words, she has faith that as the facts reveal themselves to her, that she has the abilities to detect them via her senses. That she can know facts using human senses.

2 – She BELIEVES that her mental faculties are trustworthy. And – she believes the peer group that reviews her work – also have trustworthy mental faculties. These scientists trust their rational faculties. They just take for granted, for example, that their rational faculties allow them to perceive, compare, combine, remember and infer. In other words, these people believe their mental faculties are reliable and can be used to reach legitimate conclusions.

3 – She BELIEVES certain critical truths that she has NOT learned thru scientific observation alone:

  • Every effect must have a cause
  • The same cause under like minded circumstances will produce the same effect.

4 – She BELIEVES it is moral and right to use her rational faculties, not to manufacture and make up things, but to accurately observe the behaviour of these enzymes, and report them as honestly and rigorously as she can.

 

That’s a lot of faith / belief before we start our scientific analysis. Don’t you think? Perhaps you and I are in the same boat whether we do science or not. People often appeal to science because it holds a lot of authority in our culture today. But what is science actually grounded upon?

Sir John Polkinghorn has said:

“Science does not explain the mathematical intelligibility of the physical world, for it is part of science’s founding faith that this is so.”

Professor of Mathematics, John Lennox, has continued.[2] You cannot begin to do physics without believing in the intelligibility of the universe. And on what evidence do scientists base their faith? Lennox observes the following:

1 – Human reason did not create the universe.

2 – Humans did not create our own powers of reason either. We can hone them, but we didn’t originate them.

How odd then that what goes on our tiny heads actually gives us anything near a true account of the behaviour of the staggering universe in which we inhabit? This is truly an unreasonable conclusion…from the perspective of atheism.

BUT – for a theist – the grounding beliefs of the scientist and the observations above make perfect sense. And they resonate perfectly with:

In the beginning was the Word … and the Word was God … All things came to be through him.” (John 1:1,3)

[1] Nancey Murphy, Beyond Liberalism & Fundamentalism, (New York: Trinity Press International, 2007), 33-34, summarised.

[2] John C. Lennox, Can Science Explain Everything, (Oxford: The Good Book Company, 2019), loc 526.

Published by

Respond

I live in the UK, I'm married to Janet and I'm passionate about proposing a case for the historic Christian faith. You can find me on Twitter at @stuhgray.

4 thoughts on “Faith of the Scientist”

  1. The scientist doesn’t stake anything on that belief until it is peer reviewed, falsified, and reproduced by other scientists. The belief your referring to is a far cry from religious belief. Belief is designed as a temporary state to prove a point. Religious faith has become the ultimate virtue of religion, but it’s a worthless arrival at an imaginary destination that you can’t corroborate with any evidence. It’s quite a stretch to compare religious faith with the scientific method, where ideas that don’t work go by the wayside. Religion hasn’t ever produced the promised outcomes or fulfilled a single prophecy, yet here you are, selling a broken record.

    1. In other words, scientific faith is a temporary waypoint to prove a premise, where religious faith is a destination. Then once you agree to believe without evidence it messes with your neurology in such a way you’ll defend a mere belief with an argument.

  2. Hi there Jim

    Hope you are doing well. Sorry , but I think you might have missed the point of this blog? I’m not comparing religious faith to the scientific method here. Actually, that would be an odd thing to do. The scientific methods were initiated by Christians of the past, and many Nobel Prize winners in Science have been Christians. A recent study of professional scientists I think put the number of Christians in the field today at around 40%. The issue is not science vs Christianity, there is no battle between them. That some people say there is…is simply the convenient propagation of a myth, I think.

    Coming back to the point of the blog…the point is to demonstrate that, whatever our worldview is, our lives are grounded on fundamental beliefs about ourselves and nature that cannot be demonstrated or proven by scientific means. Your comments about peer review and evidence…they ALL are built upon the grounding beliefs I summarise in my blog. The fact of these philosophical beliefs is quite a difficult reality to square with on the atheistic worldview, but not on theism. That’s the blog’s claim that could be responded to if you would like to?

    In your comments, you do also assert the common caricature of “religious faith” which doesn’t match the Biblical definition of faith for the Christian. No Christian I know would agree with you that the definition of the word “faith” is belief in the absence of evidence. This is a straw man argument put up by people who haven’t yet discovered what Christian faith actually is. That’s not a difficult situation to resolve tho…it just takes the will to do so. Actually…I wrote a blog about this issue a few days ago.

    Cheers!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s